consumer: depend in food chain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.62
, business people
Weight: 0.61
, mechanism
Weight: 0.60
, client
Weight: 0.59
Siblings user
Weight: 0.64
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.61
, pet owner
Weight: 0.58
, listener
Weight: 0.54
, boomer
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
depend in food chain 1.00
be important in food chain 0.92
be at bottom of food chain 0.86
depend on producers for food 0.84
be differentiated in food chain 0.84
belong to two food chains 0.83
belong to two different food chains 0.82
be listed after producers in food chain 0.81
get food 0.79
want food 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(consumer, depend in food chain)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(consumer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(consumer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(consumer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(consumer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(consumer, be listed after producers in food chain)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(consumer, depend on producers for food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(consumer, belong to two different food chains)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(consumer, belong to two different food chains)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(consumer, get food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(consumer, get food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(consumer, belong to two different food chains)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(consumer, get food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(consumer, get food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(consumer, belong to two different food chains)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(consumer, be listed after producers in food chain)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(consumer, depend on producers for food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(consumer, depend on producers for food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(consumer, be listed after producers in food chain)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(consumer, depend on producers for food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(consumer, be listed after producers in food chain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(consumer, depend in food chain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(consumer, depend in food chain)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(consumer, depend in food chain)