consumer: drive food industry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.62
, business people
Weight: 0.61
, mechanism
Weight: 0.60
, client
Weight: 0.59
Siblings user
Weight: 0.64
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.61
, pet owner
Weight: 0.58
, listener
Weight: 0.54
, boomer
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
drive food industry 1.00
get food 0.81
benefit from industries 0.78
benefit from competitive industries 0.78
want food 0.78
be important in food chain 0.77
depend on producers for food 0.76
benefit from perfectly competitive industries 0.76
want organic food 0.76
be at bottom of food chain 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(consumer, drive food industry)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(consumer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(consumer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(consumer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(consumer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(consumer, get food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(consumer, get food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(consumer, depend on producers for food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(consumer, get food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(consumer, get food)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(consumer, depend on producers for food)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(consumer, depend on producers for food)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(consumer, depend on producers for food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(consumer, drive food industry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(consumer, drive food industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(consumer, drive food industry)