consumer: use money

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.62
, business people
Weight: 0.61
, mechanism
Weight: 0.60
, client
Weight: 0.59
Siblings user
Weight: 0.64
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.61
, pet owner
Weight: 0.58
, listener
Weight: 0.54
, boomer
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
use money 1.00
use snapchat 0.81
use instagram 0.81
use resources 0.79
use the 0.77
want buy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(client, want buy)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(consumer, use money)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(client, want buy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(client, want buy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(user, use instagram)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(client, want buy)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(consumer, use money)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(user, use instagram)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(user, use instagram)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(consumer, use money)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(consumer, use resources)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(consumer, use resources)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(consumer, use resources)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(consumer, use resources)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(consumer, use money)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(consumer, use money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(client, want buy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(user, use instagram)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(consumer, use money)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(client, want buy)