consumer: waste food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.62
, business people
Weight: 0.61
, mechanism
Weight: 0.60
, client
Weight: 0.59
Siblings user
Weight: 0.64
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.61
, pet owner
Weight: 0.58
, listener
Weight: 0.54
, boomer
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
waste food 1.00
get food 0.81
accumulate waste year 0.81
want food 0.80
want organic food 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(consumer, waste food)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(consumer, waste food)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(consumer, waste food)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(consumer, get food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(consumer, waste food)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(consumer, get food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(consumer, waste food)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(consumer, get food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(consumer, waste food)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(consumer, get food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(consumer, waste food)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(consumer, waste food)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(consumer, waste food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(consumer, waste food)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(consumer, waste food)