consumption: be led bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.62
, disease
Weight: 0.59
, production
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.35
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.34
, output
Weight: 0.34
, demand
Weight: 0.33
, spending
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be led bad 1.00
be led growth bad 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(consumption, be led bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(consumption, be led bad)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(consumption, be led bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(consumption, be led growth bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(consumption, be led bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(consumption, be led growth bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(consumption, be led bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(consumption, be led growth bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(consumption, be led bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(consumption, be led growth bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(consumption, be led bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(consumption, be led bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(consumption, be led bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(consumption, be led bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(consumption, be led bad)