contact lenses: be better than glasses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than glasses 1.00
be better than glass spectacles 0.88
be vs glasses 0.85
compare to lenses 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(contact lenses, be better than glasses)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(contact lenses, be better than glass spectacles)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(contact lenses, be vs glasses)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(contact lenses, be vs glasses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(contact lenses, be vs glasses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(contact lenses, compare to lenses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(contact lenses, be better than glass spectacles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(contact lenses, be better than glass spectacles)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(contact lenses, be better than glass spectacles)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(contact lenses, compare to lenses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(contact lenses, compare to lenses)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(contact lenses, compare to lenses)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contact lenses, be vs glasses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(contact lenses, be better than glasses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(contact lenses, be better than glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(contact lenses, be better than glasses)