contact lenses: compare to lenses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare to lenses 1.00
compare to soft lenses 0.95
be better than glass spectacles 0.76
be better than glasses 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(contact lenses, compare to lenses)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(contact lenses, compare to soft lenses)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(contact lenses, compare to soft lenses)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(contact lenses, compare to soft lenses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(contact lenses, be better than glass spectacles)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(contact lenses, be better than glasses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(contact lenses, be better than glass spectacles)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(contact lenses, compare to soft lenses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(contact lenses, be better than glasses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(contact lenses, be better than glass spectacles)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(contact lenses, be better than glasses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(contact lenses, be better than glasses)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(contact lenses, be better than glass spectacles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(contact lenses, compare to lenses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(contact lenses, compare to lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(contact lenses, compare to lenses)