container: be locked at docks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vessel
Weight: 0.62
, solution
Weight: 0.61
, receptacle
Weight: 0.60
, cargo
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cup
Weight: 0.69
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.68
, garbage can
Weight: 0.67
, coffee cup
Weight: 0.66
, mailbox
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be locked at docks 1.00
is locked 0.81
sit long in ports 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cargo, sit long in ports)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(container, be locked at docks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(container, be locked at docks)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cargo, sit long in ports)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(container, be locked at docks)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cargo, sit long in ports)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(container, be locked at docks)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mailbox, is locked)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cargo, sit long in ports)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(container, be locked at docks)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(container, be locked at docks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(container, be locked at docks)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mailbox, is locked)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(mailbox, is locked)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(container, be locked at docks)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(container, be locked at docks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(container, be locked at docks)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(container, be locked at docks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(container, be locked at docks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(container, be locked at docks)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(container, be locked at docks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(container, be locked at docks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cargo, sit long in ports)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(container, be locked at docks)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mailbox, is locked)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(container, be locked at docks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cargo, sit long in ports)