container: be made of metal

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vessel
Weight: 0.62
, solution
Weight: 0.61
, unit
Weight: 0.58
, cargo
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cup
Weight: 0.69
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.68
, garbage can
Weight: 0.67
, coffee cup
Weight: 0.66
, mailbox
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made of metal 1.00
be made of plastic 0.84
be make from plastic 0.81
be make out of plastic 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(container, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cup, be make from plastic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(container, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cup, be make from plastic)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cup, be make from plastic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(container, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(container, be made of metal)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(container, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(container, be made of plastic)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(container, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(container, be made of plastic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(container, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(container, be make out of plastic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(container, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(container, be made of plastic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(container, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(container, be make out of plastic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(container, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(container, be made of plastic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(container, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(container, be make out of plastic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(container, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(container, be make out of plastic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(container, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(container, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(container, be made of metal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(container, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(container, be made of metal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(container, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cup, be make from plastic)