container: has physical part ridges

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vessel
Weight: 0.62
, solution
Weight: 0.61
, receptacle
Weight: 0.60
, cargo
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cup
Weight: 0.69
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.68
, garbage can
Weight: 0.67
, coffee cup
Weight: 0.66
, mailbox
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part ridges 1.00
have ridges in neck 0.89
has physical part bottoms 0.78
has physical part holes 0.77
have curved bottoms 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cup, have ridges in neck)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coffee cup, has physical part holes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, have curved bottoms)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cup, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cup, has physical part ridges)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cup, have ridges in neck)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cup, have ridges in neck)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(coffee cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(coffee cup, has physical part holes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cup, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cup, has physical part holes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(wine bottle, have curved bottoms)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, have curved bottoms)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(container, has physical part ridges)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(container, has physical part holes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(container, has physical part holes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part holes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(container, has physical part holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part ridges)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(container, has physical part ridges)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cup, has physical part ridges)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cup, have ridges in neck)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(coffee cup, has physical part holes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cup, has physical part holes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part ridges)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wine bottle, have curved bottoms)