container: have paper separator cups

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vessel
Weight: 0.62
, solution
Weight: 0.61
, receptacle
Weight: 0.60
, cargo
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cup
Weight: 0.69
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.68
, garbage can
Weight: 0.67
, coffee cup
Weight: 0.66
, mailbox
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
have paper separator cups 1.00
be called cups 0.81
be for storage of food electroplated 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(container, have paper separator cups)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(cup, be called cups)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(container, have paper separator cups)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(cup, be called cups)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(cup, be called cups)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(container, have paper separator cups)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(container, have paper separator cups)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(container, have paper separator cups)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(container, be for storage of food electroplated)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(container, have paper separator cups)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(container, be for storage of food electroplated)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(container, have paper separator cups)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(container, be for storage of food electroplated)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(container, have paper separator cups)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(container, be for storage of food electroplated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(container, have paper separator cups)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, have paper separator cups)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(container, have paper separator cups)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(container, have paper separator cups)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, have paper separator cups)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(container, have paper separator cups)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(cup, be called cups)