container: sold in heavy metal containers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vessel
Weight: 0.62
, solution
Weight: 0.61
, receptacle
Weight: 0.60
, cargo
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cup
Weight: 0.69
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.68
, garbage can
Weight: 0.67
, coffee cup
Weight: 0.66
, mailbox
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
sold in heavy metal containers 1.00
sold in metal containers 0.97
be for storage of food electroplated 0.79
has physical part lids 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(container, sold in heavy metal containers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(coffee cup, has physical part lids)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(container, sold in heavy metal containers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(coffee cup, has physical part lids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coffee cup, has physical part lids)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(container, sold in heavy metal containers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(container, sold in heavy metal containers)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(container, sold in heavy metal containers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(container, sold in metal containers)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(container, sold in heavy metal containers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(container, sold in metal containers)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(container, sold in heavy metal containers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(container, sold in metal containers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(container, sold in heavy metal containers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(container, be for storage of food electroplated)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(container, sold in heavy metal containers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(container, sold in metal containers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(container, sold in heavy metal containers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(container, be for storage of food electroplated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(container, sold in heavy metal containers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(container, be for storage of food electroplated)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(container, sold in heavy metal containers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(container, be for storage of food electroplated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(container, sold in heavy metal containers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(container, sold in heavy metal containers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(container, sold in heavy metal containers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(container, sold in heavy metal containers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(container, sold in heavy metal containers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(container, sold in heavy metal containers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coffee cup, has physical part lids)