contract: be important between customers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, record
Weight: 0.61
, warranty
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lease
Weight: 0.67
, deal
Weight: 0.59
, delivery
Weight: 0.59
, future
Weight: 0.58
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important between customers 1.00
be important to customers 0.94
be with annoying customers 0.87
be important between companies 0.83
be important for consumers 0.83
be important in business 0.77
be important for business 0.77
be important to business 0.76
be with employees 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(warranty, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(contract, be important between customers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(warranty, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(contract, be important between customers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(agreement, be with employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(contract, be important between customers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(warranty, be important to customers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(agreement, be with employees)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(warranty, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(warranty, be important for business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(warranty, be important to customers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be with employees)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(warranty, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(contract, be important between customers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(warranty, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(contract, be important between customers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(agreement, be with employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(contract, be important between customers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(contract, be important between customers)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important between companies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important for consumers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(contract, be important between companies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important to business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(contract, be important for consumers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(contract, be important between companies)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(contract, be important to business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(contract, be important in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(contract, be important between companies)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(contract, be important to business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(contract, be important to business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(contract, be important for consumers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(contract, be important for consumers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(contract, be important in business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(contract, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important between customers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(contract, be important between customers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(agreement, be with employees)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(warranty, be important to customers)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(warranty, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(agreement, be with employees)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(warranty, be important to customers)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(contract, be important between customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(warranty, be important for business)