contract: deals work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, record
Weight: 0.61
, warranty
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lease
Weight: 0.67
, deal
Weight: 0.59
, delivery
Weight: 0.59
, future
Weight: 0.58
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
deals work 1.00
deals 0.97
is deal 0.84
is bad deal 0.81
have contracts 0.79
is contracts 0.79
have important contracts 0.78
is agreements 0.78
work in terms 0.77
have prevalent contracts 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(agreement, is contracts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(contract, deals work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(agreement, is contracts)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(agreement, is contracts)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(future, have contracts)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(future, have prevalent contracts)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(future, have important contracts)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(deal, is bad deal)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(lease, deals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(agreement, is contracts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(contract, deals work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(lease, deals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lease, deals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(deal, is bad deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(deal, is bad deal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(future, have important contracts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(future, have important contracts)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(future, have contracts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(future, have contracts)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(future, have prevalent contracts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(future, have prevalent contracts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(contract, deals work)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(contract, is agreements)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(contract, is agreements)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(contract, is agreements)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(contract, is agreements)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, deals work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(contract, deals work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(agreement, is contracts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(lease, deals)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(future, have prevalent contracts)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(future, have contracts)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(future, have important contracts)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(deal, is bad deal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(contract, deals work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(agreement, is contracts)