contract: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, record
Weight: 0.61
, warranty
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lease
Weight: 0.67
, deal
Weight: 0.59
, delivery
Weight: 0.59
, future
Weight: 0.58
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality worth 0.85
has quality service 0.81
has quality price 0.80
be good company work for 0.78
sound good 0.78
be good company work 0.77
has consistency retention 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(warranty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(loan, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(record, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(record, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(record, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(loan, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(loan, be good company work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(warranty, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(record, has consistency retention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(record, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(record, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(record, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(warranty, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(record, has consistency retention)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(warranty, has quality service)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(loan, be good company work for)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(loan, be good company work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(record, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(record, has quality better)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(record, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(loan, be good company work for)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(loan, be good company work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(record, has consistency retention)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(future, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(solicitation, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(deal, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(future, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(loan, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(record, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(warranty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(record, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(record, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(warranty, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(loan, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(loan, be good company work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(record, has consistency retention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(future, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(future, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(future, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(future, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(deal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(deal, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(delivery, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(solicitation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(solicitation, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(contract, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(contract, has quality price)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality price)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality price)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(record, has consistency retention)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(record, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(loan, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(record, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(warranty, has quality service)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(record, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(loan, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(loan, be good company work)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(loan, be good company work for)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(warranty, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(future, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(future, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lease, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lease, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(deal, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(solicitation, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(record, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(loan, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(record, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(record, has consistency retention)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(record, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(loan, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(warranty, has quality service)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(warranty, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(loan, be good company work for)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(loan, be good company work)