contract: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, record
Weight: 0.61
, warranty
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lease
Weight: 0.67
, deal
Weight: 0.59
, delivery
Weight: 0.59
, future
Weight: 0.58
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00
be job growth 0.77
be with workers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(contract, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(future, be job growth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contract, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(future, be job growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(future, be job growth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contract, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(contract, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(contract, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(contract, be with workers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(contract, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(contract, be with workers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contract, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(contract, be with workers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(contract, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(contract, be with workers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(contract, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(contract, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(contract, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contract, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(contract, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(contract, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(future, be job growth)