contraction: has physical part quick

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.55
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings peristalsis
Weight: 0.41
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, growth
Weight: 0.32
, drop
Weight: 0.32
, decrease
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part quick 1.00
has physical part process 0.83
has physical part foot 0.79
has physical part web 0.79
has physical part features 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(concept, has physical part web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(contraction, has physical part quick)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(contraction, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(concept, has physical part web)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(contraction, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(concept, has physical part web)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(contraction, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drop, has physical part foot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(concept, has physical part web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(contraction, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(contraction, has physical part quick)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(contraction, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(drop, has physical part foot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(drop, has physical part foot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(contraction, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(contraction, has physical part quick)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(contraction, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(contraction, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(contraction, has physical part quick)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(contraction, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(contraction, has physical part quick)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(contraction, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(concept, has physical part web)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(contraction, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(drop, has physical part foot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(contraction, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(concept, has physical part web)