contractor: be paid more than employees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, workman
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.61
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, builder
Weight: 0.63
, plumber
Weight: 0.63
, agent
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be paid more than employees 1.00
hire full time workers people 0.82
hire time workers people 0.82
hire full time workers 0.81
hire time workers 0.81
hire full time contingent workers people 0.79
hire time contingent workers people 0.78
hire full time contingent workers 0.78
hire time contingent workers 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(contractor, be paid more than employees)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(contractor, hire time workers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(contractor, hire time workers people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(contractor, hire time workers people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(contractor, hire time workers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(contractor, hire full time workers people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(contractor, hire time contingent workers people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(contractor, hire full time workers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(contractor, hire time contingent workers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(contractor, hire time workers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(contractor, hire time workers people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(contractor, hire time contingent workers people)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(contractor, hire full time contingent workers people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(contractor, hire time contingent workers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(contractor, hire full time contingent workers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(contractor, hire time contingent workers people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, hire full time workers people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(contractor, hire time contingent workers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(contractor, hire full time workers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(contractor, hire full time contingent workers people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(contractor, hire time workers people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(contractor, hire full time workers people)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(contractor, hire full time contingent workers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(contractor, hire time workers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(contractor, hire full time workers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(contractor, hire full time contingent workers people)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, hire full time contingent workers people)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(contractor, hire full time workers people)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(contractor, hire full time contingent workers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(contractor, hire time contingent workers people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(contractor, hire full time workers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(contractor, hire full time contingent workers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(contractor, hire time contingent workers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid more than employees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid more than employees)