contractor: charge vat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, workman
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.61
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, builder
Weight: 0.63
, plumber
Weight: 0.63
, agent
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
charge vat 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(contractor, charge vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge vat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(contractor, charge vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(builder, charge vat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(contractor, charge vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(agent, charge vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(agent, charge vat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(contractor, charge vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(builder, charge vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(builder, charge vat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(contractor, charge vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(contractor, charge vat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(contractor, charge vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(contractor, charge vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(contractor, charge vat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(contractor, charge vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(contractor, charge vat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(contractor, charge vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(agent, charge vat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(contractor, charge vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(builder, charge vat)