:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Property |
Similarity |
do |
1.00 |
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(contractor, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, do)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(contractor, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(plumber, do)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(contractor, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(architect, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architect, do)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(contractor, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(plumber, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(plumber, do)
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(contractor, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(contractor, do)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(contractor, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(contractor, do)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(contractor, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(architect, do)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(contractor, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(plumber, do)