contractor: get paid more

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, workman
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.61
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, builder
Weight: 0.63
, plumber
Weight: 0.63
, agent
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid more 1.00
is paid more 0.97
get paid 0.96
is paid 0.92
be paid in cash 0.85
earn more 0.83
pay less tax 0.81
pay more taxes 0.81
pay taxes 0.76
pay tax 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid more)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid more)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plumber, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(plumber, is paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid more)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid more)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plumber, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(plumber, get paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(plumber, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(plumber, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(contractor, get paid more)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(contractor, get paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(contractor, is paid more)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(contractor, is paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(contractor, pay less tax)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay taxes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(contractor, pay taxes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay tax)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(contractor, pay tax)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay taxes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(contractor, earn more)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay tax)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid more)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(contractor, earn more)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid more)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay less tax)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(contractor, pay taxes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(contractor, pay tax)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(contractor, earn more)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(contractor, earn more)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, pay less tax)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid in cash)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(plumber, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(plumber, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(contractor, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)