contractor: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, workman
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.61
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, builder
Weight: 0.63
, plumber
Weight: 0.63
, agent
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
get paid 0.96
is paid more 0.95
get paid more 0.92
be paid in cash 0.88
pay more taxes 0.77
pay taxes 0.77
pay less tax 0.77
pay tax 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(plumber, is paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plumber, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(plumber, is paid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(plumber, is paid)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plumber, get paid)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(plumber, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(contractor, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(contractor, get paid)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(contractor, is paid more)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(contractor, get paid more)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid more)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid more)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid more)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid more)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(contractor, pay taxes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay taxes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay taxes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(contractor, pay tax)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay tax)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(contractor, pay less tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(contractor, pay taxes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(contractor, pay tax)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay less tax)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, pay less tax)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(plumber, get paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(plumber, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)