contractor: need license

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, workman
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.61
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, builder
Weight: 0.63
, plumber
Weight: 0.63
, agent
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
need license 1.00
is licensed 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(architect, is licensed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(architect, need license)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(architect, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(architect, need license)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(architect, is licensed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(contractor, need license)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is licensed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(contractor, is licensed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(contractor, is licensed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(contractor, is licensed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(contractor, need license)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(contractor, need license)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(architect, need license)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(architect, is licensed)