contractor: pay less tax

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, workman
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.61
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, builder
Weight: 0.63
, plumber
Weight: 0.63
, agent
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
pay less tax 1.00
pay tax 0.97
pay more taxes 0.95
pay taxes 0.93
is paid more 0.82
get paid more 0.81
get paid 0.78
be paid in cash 0.77
is paid 0.77
pay employers insurance 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, pay less tax)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, pay less tax)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plumber, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(plumber, is paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay less tax)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay less tax)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plumber, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(plumber, get paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(plumber, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(plumber, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(contractor, pay less tax)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay tax)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay taxes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(contractor, pay tax)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay tax)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(contractor, pay taxes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay taxes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(contractor, pay tax)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(contractor, pay taxes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid more)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid more)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(contractor, pay employers insurance)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, pay employers insurance)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay employers insurance)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay employers insurance)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid more)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid more)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(contractor, get paid more)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(contractor, get paid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(contractor, is paid more)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(contractor, is paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, pay less tax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(plumber, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(plumber, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, pay less tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)