contractor: pay more taxes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, workman
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.61
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, builder
Weight: 0.63
, plumber
Weight: 0.63
, agent
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
pay more taxes 1.00
pay taxes 0.99
pay less tax 0.95
pay tax 0.95
is paid more 0.81
get paid more 0.81
get paid 0.78
is paid 0.77
be paid in cash 0.77
pay employers insurance 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(plumber, is paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plumber, get paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plumber, get paid)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(plumber, get paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(plumber, is paid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(plumber, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay taxes)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(contractor, pay taxes)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay taxes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay tax)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(contractor, pay taxes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(contractor, pay tax)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay tax)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(contractor, pay tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, pay less tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay less tax)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(contractor, pay less tax)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid more)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, pay employers insurance)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay employers insurance)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(contractor, pay employers insurance)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid more)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay employers insurance)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid more)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid more)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(contractor, get paid more)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(contractor, get paid)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(contractor, is paid)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(contractor, is paid more)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(contractor, be paid in cash)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(plumber, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(plumber, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)