control: be important at levels of organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pressure
Weight: 0.61
, equipment
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.57
Siblings remote control
Weight: 0.80
, balance
Weight: 0.62
, thermostat
Weight: 0.60
, gas pedal
Weight: 0.57
, gain
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important at levels of organization 1.00
be important in organization 0.88
be necessary in organization 0.85
be important in state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(control, be important at levels of organization)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(control, be important in organization)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(control, be necessary in organization)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(control, be important in organization)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(control, be important in organization)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(control, be necessary in organization)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(control, be necessary in organization)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(control, be important in state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(control, be necessary in organization)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(control, be important in state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(control, be important in state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(control, be important in organization)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(control, be important in state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(control, be important at levels of organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(control, be important at levels of organization)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(control, be important at levels of organization)