control: be important in state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pressure
Weight: 0.61
, equipment
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.57
Siblings remote control
Weight: 0.80
, balance
Weight: 0.62
, thermostat
Weight: 0.60
, gas pedal
Weight: 0.57
, gain
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in state 1.00
is set-up important 0.85
was important to songhai 0.82
be important in business 0.78
be important in family 0.77
be important in organization 0.77
be important in totalitarian state 0.76
be important at levels of organization 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(control, be important in state)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(control, is set-up important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(control, is set-up important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(control, is set-up important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(control, was important to songhai)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(control, was important to songhai)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(control, be important at levels of organization)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(control, be important in family)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(control, be important in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(control, be important in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(control, be important in organization)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(control, was important to songhai)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(control, be important in family)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(control, be important in organization)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(control, be important in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(control, be important in totalitarian state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(control, be important in family)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(control, be important at levels of organization)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(control, be important in organization)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(control, be important in totalitarian state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(control, be important in family)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(control, be important in business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(control, be important in totalitarian state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(control, be important at levels of organization)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(control, be important in totalitarian state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(control, be important in organization)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(control, is set-up important)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(control, be important at levels of organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(control, be important in state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(control, be important in state)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(control, be important in state)