control: do work for base running in rtts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pressure
Weight: 0.61
, equipment
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.57
Siblings remote control
Weight: 0.80
, balance
Weight: 0.62
, thermostat
Weight: 0.60
, gas pedal
Weight: 0.57
, gain
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
do work for base running in rtts 1.00
stop working 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(control, do work for base running in rtts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(thermostat, stop working)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(control, do work for base running in rtts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(remote control, stop working)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(control, do work for base running in rtts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(remote control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(remote control, stop working)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(control, do work for base running in rtts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(thermostat, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(thermostat, stop working)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(control, do work for base running in rtts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(control, do work for base running in rtts)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(control, do work for base running in rtts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(control, stop working)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(control, do work for base running in rtts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(control, stop working)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(control, do work for base running in rtts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(control, stop working)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(control, do work for base running in rtts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(control, stop working)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(control, do work for base running in rtts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(control, do work for base running in rtts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(control, do work for base running in rtts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(control, do work for base running in rtts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(control, do work for base running in rtts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(control, do work for base running in rtts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(remote control, stop working)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(control, do work for base running in rtts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(thermostat, stop working)