control: was important to songhai

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pressure
Weight: 0.61
, equipment
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.57
Siblings remote control
Weight: 0.80
, balance
Weight: 0.62
, thermostat
Weight: 0.60
, gas pedal
Weight: 0.57
, gain
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to songhai 1.00
is set-up important 0.93
be important in state 0.82
be important in business 0.78
be important in family 0.77
was important to athens 0.77
was vital for allies 0.76
is needed 0.76
be important in organization 0.75
was important to romans 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(equipment, is needed)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(control, was important to songhai)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(equipment, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(thermostat, is needed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(equipment, is needed)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(control, was important to songhai)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(thermostat, is needed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(thermostat, is needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(control, was important to songhai)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(control, is set-up important)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(control, is set-up important)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(control, is set-up important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(control, be important in state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(control, be important in state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(control, be important in business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(control, be important in business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(control, be important in family)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(control, be important in state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(control, be important in family)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(control, was important to athens)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(control, be important in organization)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(control, was important to athens)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(control, was vital for allies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(control, be important in organization)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(control, was important to romans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(control, be important in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(control, be important in family)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(control, was important to romans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(control, was vital for allies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(control, was important to athens)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(control, be important in organization)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(control, be important in family)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(control, was important to romans)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(control, be important in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(control, was vital for allies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(control, be important in state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(control, was important to romans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(control, is set-up important)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(control, be important in organization)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(control, was important to athens)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(control, was vital for allies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(control, was important to songhai)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(equipment, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(thermostat, is needed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(control, was important to songhai)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(equipment, is needed)