controller: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.63
, network device
Weight: 0.62
, member
Weight: 0.61
, processor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer keyboard
Weight: 0.34
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.34
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.34
, computer network
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is pricey 0.89
is costly 0.87
is damn expensive 0.84
be more expensive than tv 0.81
be more expensive than than tv 0.80
be more expensive than tvs 0.79
be much cheaper than tvs 0.77
be cheaper than tvs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(processor, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(controller, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(processor, is costly)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(controller, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(processor, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(processor, is costly)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(processor, is costly)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(processor, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(controller, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(processor, is costly)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(controller, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(controller, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(controller, is pricey)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(controller, is pricey)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(controller, is pricey)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(controller, is damn expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(controller, is damn expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(controller, is damn expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(controller, is pricey)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(controller, is damn expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(controller, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(processor, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(processor, is costly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(processor, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(controller, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(processor, is costly)