controller: is frequently banned

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.63
, network device
Weight: 0.62
, member
Weight: 0.61
, processor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer keyboard
Weight: 0.34
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.34
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.34
, computer network
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is frequently banned 1.00
is banned 0.89
be banned on planes 0.80
get banned from app 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(electronic device, be banned on planes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(controller, is frequently banned)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(controller, is frequently banned)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(electronic device, be banned on planes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(controller, is frequently banned)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, be banned on planes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(electronic device, be banned on planes)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(controller, is frequently banned)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(controller, is frequently banned)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(controller, is frequently banned)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(controller, is frequently banned)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(controller, is frequently banned)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(controller, is banned)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(controller, is frequently banned)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(controller, is banned)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(controller, is frequently banned)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(controller, is banned)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(controller, is frequently banned)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(controller, is banned)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(controller, is frequently banned)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(controller, is frequently banned)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(controller, is frequently banned)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(controller, is frequently banned)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(controller, is frequently banned)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(controller, is frequently banned)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(electronic device, be banned on planes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(controller, is frequently banned)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(electronic device, be banned on planes)