convection: be involved if thunderstorm

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, process
Weight: 0.51
, concept
Weight: 0.51
, way
Weight: 0.49
Siblings moisture
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.32
, subduction
Weight: 0.32
, hydrolysis
Weight: 0.31
, atmospheric pressure
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be involved if thunderstorm 1.00
affect weather 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(convection, be involved if thunderstorm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(moisture, affect weather)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(convection, be involved if thunderstorm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(atmospheric pressure, affect weather)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(convection, be involved if thunderstorm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(atmospheric pressure, affect weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(atmospheric pressure, affect weather)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(convection, be involved if thunderstorm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(moisture, affect weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(moisture, affect weather)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(convection, be involved if thunderstorm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(convection, be involved if thunderstorm)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(convection, be involved if thunderstorm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(convection, affect weather)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(convection, be involved if thunderstorm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(convection, affect weather)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(convection, be involved if thunderstorm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(convection, affect weather)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(convection, be involved if thunderstorm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(convection, affect weather)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(convection, be involved if thunderstorm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(convection, be involved if thunderstorm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(convection, be involved if thunderstorm)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(convection, be involved if thunderstorm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(convection, be involved if thunderstorm)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(convection, be involved if thunderstorm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(moisture, affect weather)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(convection, be involved if thunderstorm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(atmospheric pressure, affect weather)