convection: be more efficient than conduction

Property	Similarity
be more efficient than conduction	1.00
be more important than conduction	0.96
be faster than conduction	0.95
be quicker than conduction	0.94
be different to conduction	0.91
is conduction	0.91
be different from conduction	0.91
rely on conduction	0.88
be more important than conduction in troposphere	0.87
differ from conduction	0.87

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(convection, is conduction)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(convection, rely on conduction)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(convection, differ from conduction)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(convection, be different from conduction)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(convection, differ from conduction)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(convection, is conduction)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(convection, be different to conduction)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(convection, be quicker than conduction)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(convection, be quicker than conduction)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(convection, be quicker than conduction)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(convection, rely on conduction)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(convection, differ from conduction)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(convection, be quicker than conduction)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(convection, be faster than conduction)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(convection, is conduction)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(convection, be different from conduction)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(convection, be faster than conduction)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(convection, be different to conduction)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(convection, be faster than conduction)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(convection, be faster than conduction)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(convection, rely on conduction)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(convection, be different to conduction)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(convection, be more important than conduction in troposphere)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(convection, be different from conduction)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(convection, be more important than conduction in troposphere)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(convection, be different to conduction)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(convection, be more important than conduction in troposphere)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(convection, be different from conduction)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(convection, be more important than conduction in troposphere)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(convection, is conduction)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(convection, rely on conduction)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(convection, be more efficient than conduction) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(convection, differ from conduction)

Parents	factor Weight: 0.52 , thing Weight: 0.51 , process Weight: 0.51 , concept Weight: 0.51 , way Weight: 0.49
Siblings	moisture Weight: 0.32 , combustion Weight: 0.32 , subduction Weight: 0.32 , hydrolysis Weight: 0.31 , atmospheric pressure Weight: 0.31

convection: be more efficient than conduction

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible