convenience store: be in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.86
, food store
Weight: 0.82
, location
Weight: 0.77
, store
Weight: 0.67
Siblings hardware store
Weight: 0.77
, gas station
Weight: 0.72
, supermarket
Weight: 0.71
, shopping center
Weight: 0.70
, grocery
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in california 1.00
be expensive in florida 0.80
be in oregon service 0.80
is usa 0.80
dallas tx 0.79
be in alaska 0.79
be in oregon full service 0.79
be full service in oregon 0.79
be expensive in alaska 0.78
be popular in japan 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(food store, dallas tx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(convenience store, be in california)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(food store, dallas tx)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(food store, dallas tx)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in florida)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in alaska)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(gas station, be in oregon full service)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(gas station, be full service in oregon)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(food store, dallas tx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(convenience store, be in california)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(gas station, be full service in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(gas station, be full service in oregon)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(gas station, be in oregon full service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(gas station, be in oregon full service)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(grocery, be expensive in florida)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(grocery, be expensive in alaska)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(convenience store, be in california)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(convenience store, is usa)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(convenience store, is usa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(convenience store, is usa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, be popular in japan)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(convenience store, be popular in japan)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, is usa)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(convenience store, be popular in japan)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(convenience store, be popular in japan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, be in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(convenience store, be in california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(food store, dallas tx)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(grocery, be expensive in florida)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(gas station, be in oregon full service)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(gas station, be full service in oregon)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(grocery, be expensive in alaska)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(food store, dallas tx)