convention: be important in media

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.67
, document
Weight: 0.62
, gathering
Weight: 0.61
, organization
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pax
Weight: 0.44
, national convention
Weight: 0.40
, exposition
Weight: 0.35
, concert hall
Weight: 0.34
, gala
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in media 1.00
use media 0.91
use social media 0.87
be important today 0.76
be important in business communication 0.76
be important for business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(document, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(convention, be important in media)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(document, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(document, be important for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(document, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(convention, be important in media)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(convention, be important in media)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(convention, be important today)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(convention, be important in business communication)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(convention, be important today)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(convention, be important in business communication)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(convention, be important in business communication)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(convention, be important today)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(convention, be important today)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(convention, be important in business communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(convention, be important in media)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(convention, be important in media)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(document, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(convention, be important in media)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(document, be important for business)