convention: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.67
, document
Weight: 0.62
, gathering
Weight: 0.61
, organization
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pax
Weight: 0.44
, national convention
Weight: 0.40
, exposition
Weight: 0.35
, concert hall
Weight: 0.34
, gala
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality change 0.86
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality worth 0.85
CAN good 0.81
has quality systems 0.80
has quality definition 0.76
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(convention, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gathering, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(convention, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(convention, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(exposition, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pax, is best)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(gala, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(convention, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gathering, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(convention, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(convention, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(gala, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(gala, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(exposition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(exposition, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(pax, is best)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pax, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(convention, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(convention, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(convention, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(gala, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(exposition, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pax, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(convention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)