conversation: be important in relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents exchange
Weight: 0.62
, fact
Weight: 0.61
, article
Weight: 0.61
, thread
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chat
Weight: 0.63
, dialogue
Weight: 0.59
, tweet
Weight: 0.56
, session
Weight: 0.56
, news article
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in relationship 1.00
be in term relationship 0.90
be in long term relationship 0.88
be in later term relationship 0.87
be in later long term relationship 0.86
be important to partnership 0.83
be important to successful partnership 0.83
find important in labor relations 0.78
be important in life 0.75
be important in leadership communication 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(article, be important to successful partnership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(conversation, be important in relationship)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fact, find important in labor relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(conversation, be important in relationship)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(article, be important to successful partnership)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fact, find important in labor relations)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fact, find important in labor relations)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(article, be important to successful partnership)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in life)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(article, be important to successful partnership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(conversation, be important in relationship)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fact, find important in labor relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(conversation, be important in relationship)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(conversation, be important in relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(conversation, be in term relationship)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(conversation, be in term relationship)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(conversation, be in long term relationship)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(conversation, be in term relationship)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(conversation, be in later term relationship)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(conversation, be in long term relationship)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(conversation, be in later long term relationship)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(conversation, be in later term relationship)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(conversation, be in long term relationship)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(conversation, be in later long term relationship)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(conversation, be in later term relationship)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(conversation, be in later long term relationship)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(conversation, be important in life)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(conversation, be important in leadership communication)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in later term relationship)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(conversation, be important in life)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(conversation, be important in leadership communication)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(conversation, be important in life)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in later long term relationship)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in long term relationship)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(conversation, be important in leadership communication)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in term relationship)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be important in leadership communication)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be important in life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(conversation, be important in relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(article, be important to successful partnership)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fact, find important in labor relations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(article, be important to successful partnership)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(conversation, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fact, find important in labor relations)