conversation: be in long term relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents exchange
Weight: 0.62
, fact
Weight: 0.61
, article
Weight: 0.61
, thread
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chat
Weight: 0.63
, dialogue
Weight: 0.59
, tweet
Weight: 0.56
, session
Weight: 0.56
, news article
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in long term relationship 1.00
be in term relationship 0.98
be in later long term relationship 0.96
be in later term relationship 0.93
be important in relationship 0.88
be important to partnership 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(conversation, be in long term relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(conversation, be in term relationship)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(conversation, be in term relationship)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(conversation, be in later long term relationship)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(conversation, be in term relationship)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(conversation, be in later long term relationship)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(conversation, be in later term relationship)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(conversation, be in later term relationship)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(conversation, be in later long term relationship)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(conversation, be in later term relationship)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(conversation, be important in relationship)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(conversation, be important in relationship)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(conversation, be important in relationship)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in later term relationship)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in later long term relationship)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in term relationship)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in long term relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(conversation, be in long term relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(conversation, be in long term relationship)