conversation: be in pornos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents exchange
Weight: 0.62
, fact
Weight: 0.61
, article
Weight: 0.61
, thread
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chat
Weight: 0.63
, dialogue
Weight: 0.59
, tweet
Weight: 0.56
, session
Weight: 0.56
, news article
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in pornos 1.00
be in pornos dumb 0.93
be in pornos mind-numbingly dumb 0.93
be in movies 0.80
be low in movies 0.76
be used in film 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be in movies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be low in movies)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be used in film)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(dialogue, be in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be in movies)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(dialogue, be low in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be low in movies)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(dialogue, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be used in film)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(conversation, be in pornos)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in pornos dumb)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(conversation, be in pornos dumb)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(conversation, be in pornos dumb)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(conversation, be in pornos dumb)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in pornos mind-numbingly dumb)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(conversation, be in pornos mind-numbingly dumb)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(conversation, be in pornos mind-numbingly dumb)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(conversation, be in pornos mind-numbingly dumb)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in pornos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(conversation, be in pornos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(dialogue, be in movies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(dialogue, be low in movies)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in pornos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dialogue, be used in film)