conversation: be in term relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents exchange
Weight: 0.62
, fact
Weight: 0.61
, article
Weight: 0.61
, thread
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chat
Weight: 0.63
, dialogue
Weight: 0.59
, tweet
Weight: 0.56
, session
Weight: 0.56
, news article
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in term relationship 1.00
be in long term relationship 0.98
be in later term relationship 0.94
be in later long term relationship 0.94
be important in relationship 0.90
be important to partnership 0.77
be important to successful partnership 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(article, be important to successful partnership)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(conversation, be in term relationship)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(article, be important to successful partnership)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(article, be important to successful partnership)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(article, be important to successful partnership)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(conversation, be in term relationship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(conversation, be in term relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in long term relationship)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in later term relationship)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in later long term relationship)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(conversation, be in long term relationship)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be important in relationship)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(conversation, be in later term relationship)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(conversation, be in later long term relationship)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(conversation, be important in relationship)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(conversation, be in long term relationship)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(conversation, be in later long term relationship)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(conversation, be in later term relationship)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(conversation, be important in relationship)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(conversation, be in long term relationship)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(conversation, be in later term relationship)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(conversation, be in later long term relationship)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(conversation, be important in relationship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in term relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(conversation, be in term relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(article, be important to successful partnership)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(conversation, be in term relationship)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(article, be important to successful partnership)