converse: look dirty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.54
, shoe
Weight: 0.52
, company
Weight: 0.50
, sneaker
Weight: 0.47
, client
Weight: 0.45
Siblings hyundai
Weight: 0.30
, guinness
Weight: 0.30
, starbucks
Weight: 0.30
, express
Weight: 0.29
, discover
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
look dirty 1.00
look better dirty 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(converse, look dirty)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(converse, look dirty)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(converse, look dirty)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(converse, look better dirty)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(converse, look dirty)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(converse, look better dirty)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(converse, look dirty)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(converse, look better dirty)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(converse, look dirty)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(converse, look better dirty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(converse, look dirty)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(converse, look dirty)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(converse, look dirty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(converse, look dirty)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(converse, look dirty)