convict: were rewarded

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.54
, prisoner
Weight: 0.48
, term
Weight: 0.48
, favorite
Weight: 0.45
, record
Weight: 0.41
Siblings murderer
Weight: 0.33
, defendant
Weight: 0.33
, criminal
Weight: 0.32
, homeless person
Weight: 0.32
, juror
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were rewarded 1.00
were rewarded in fremantle prison 0.89
were punished 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(convict, were rewarded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(convict, were rewarded)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(convict, were rewarded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(convict, were rewarded in fremantle prison)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(convict, were rewarded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(convict, were punished)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(convict, were rewarded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(convict, were punished)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(convict, were rewarded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(convict, were rewarded in fremantle prison)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(convict, were rewarded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(convict, were punished)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(convict, were rewarded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(convict, were punished)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(convict, were rewarded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(convict, were rewarded in fremantle prison)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(convict, were rewarded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(convict, were rewarded in fremantle prison)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(convict, were rewarded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(convict, were rewarded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(convict, were rewarded)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(convict, were rewarded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(convict, were rewarded)