convict: were treated at port arthur

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.54
, prisoner
Weight: 0.48
, term
Weight: 0.48
, favorite
Weight: 0.45
, record
Weight: 0.41
Siblings murderer
Weight: 0.33
, defendant
Weight: 0.33
, criminal
Weight: 0.32
, homeless person
Weight: 0.32
, juror
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated at port arthur 1.00
were treated on ships 0.78
were transported australia 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(convict, were treated at port arthur)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(convict, were treated at port arthur)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(convict, were treated at port arthur)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(convict, were treated on ships)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(convict, were treated at port arthur)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(convict, were treated on ships)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(convict, were treated at port arthur)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(convict, were treated on ships)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(convict, were treated at port arthur)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(convict, were transported australia)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(convict, were treated at port arthur)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(convict, were transported australia)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(convict, were treated at port arthur)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(convict, were treated on ships)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(convict, were treated at port arthur)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(convict, were transported australia)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(convict, were treated at port arthur)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(convict, were transported australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(convict, were treated at port arthur)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(convict, were treated at port arthur)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(convict, were treated at port arthur)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(convict, were treated at port arthur)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(convict, were treated at port arthur)