cooked food: be better than food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than food 1.00
be better than raw food 0.91
keep longer than fresh food 0.87
be better than raw 0.83
has quality better 0.82
is more nutritious 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(cooked food, be better than food)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, keep longer than fresh food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, be better than raw food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, be better than raw)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(cooked food, keep longer than fresh food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cooked food, keep longer than fresh food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cooked food, be better than raw food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cooked food, be better than raw)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, is more nutritious)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cooked food, be better than raw)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cooked food, be better than raw food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(cooked food, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cooked food, is more nutritious)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(cooked food, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cooked food, be better than raw food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cooked food, keep longer than fresh food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cooked food, is more nutritious)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cooked food, be better than raw)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cooked food, has quality better)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cooked food, is more nutritious)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, be better than food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cooked food, be better than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(cooked food, be better than food)