Dice
About
Dialogues
Browse full collection
cooked food
:
has quality bad
from
Quasimodo
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Plausible
Typical
Remarkable
Salient
Related concepts
Parents
-
Siblings
-
Related properties
Property
Similarity
has quality bad
1.00
has quality better
0.90
go bad
0.79
Priors about this statement
Cues
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Joint
Necessity
Sufficiency
Implication
Entailment
Contradiction
Entropy
Evidence
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Plausible
Typical
Remarkable
Salient
Clauses
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight:
0.28
Evidence weight:
0.97
Similarity weight:
1.00
Evidence:
0.32
Plausible(
cooked food
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.05
¬ Salient(
cooked food
,
has quality bad
)
Similarity expansion
0.68
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
1.00
Similarity weight:
0.79
Evidence:
0.02
Remarkable(
cooked food
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.00
¬ Remarkable(
cooked food
,
go bad
)
0.67
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.99
Similarity weight:
0.79
Evidence:
0.05
Salient(
cooked food
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.01
¬ Salient(
cooked food
,
go bad
)
0.62
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.91
Similarity weight:
0.79
Evidence:
0.22
Typical(
cooked food
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.12
¬ Typical(
cooked food
,
go bad
)
0.61
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.89
Similarity weight:
0.79
Evidence:
0.32
Plausible(
cooked food
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.15
¬ Plausible(
cooked food
,
go bad
)
0.38
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.50
Similarity weight:
0.90
Evidence:
0.02
Remarkable(
cooked food
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.51
¬ Remarkable(
cooked food
,
has quality better
)
0.33
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.43
Similarity weight:
0.90
Evidence:
0.22
Typical(
cooked food
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.73
¬ Typical(
cooked food
,
has quality better
)
0.26
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.34
Similarity weight:
0.90
Evidence:
0.32
Plausible(
cooked food
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.97
¬ Plausible(
cooked food
,
has quality better
)
0.20
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.25
Similarity weight:
0.90
Evidence:
0.05
Salient(
cooked food
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.78
¬ Salient(
cooked food
,
has quality better
)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.14
Rule weight:
0.14
Evidence weight:
0.99
Similarity weight:
1.00
Evidence:
0.05
Salient(
cooked food
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.22
¬ Typical(
cooked food
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.02
¬ Remarkable(
cooked food
,
has quality bad
)
Typical implies Plausible
0.41
Rule weight:
0.48
Evidence weight:
0.85
Similarity weight:
1.00
Evidence:
0.32
Plausible(
cooked food
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.22
¬ Typical(
cooked food
,
has quality bad
)