cooking: be compared to cooking at work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.65
, craft
Weight: 0.62
, art
Weight: 0.61
, method
Weight: 0.60
, matter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings frying
Weight: 0.44
, baking
Weight: 0.36
, woodworking
Weight: 0.35
, gardening
Weight: 0.34
, quilting
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be compared to cooking at work 1.00
be considered cooking 0.87
be considered healthy cooking 0.85
differ from cooking 0.84
have cool down between cook 0.79
differ from chinese cooking 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cooking, differ from chinese cooking)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cooking, have cool down between cook)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cooking, have cool down between cook)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cooking, have cool down between cook)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cooking, have cool down between cook)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cooking, differ from chinese cooking)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cooking, differ from chinese cooking)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cooking, differ from chinese cooking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)