cooking: be considered chemical reaction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.65
, craft
Weight: 0.62
, art
Weight: 0.61
, method
Weight: 0.60
, matter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings frying
Weight: 0.44
, baking
Weight: 0.36
, woodworking
Weight: 0.35
, gardening
Weight: 0.34
, quilting
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered chemical reaction 1.00
is chemical reaction 0.97
is chemical reactions 0.94
be considered chemical change 0.89
be called chemical change 0.87
is chemical change 0.85
be chemical change 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(frying, is chemical change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(baking, is chemical change)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(frying, is chemical reaction)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(baking, is chemical reaction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(baking, is chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(baking, is chemical reaction)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(frying, is chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(frying, is chemical reaction)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(frying, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(frying, is chemical change)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(baking, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(baking, is chemical change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cooking, is chemical reaction)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cooking, is chemical reactions)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical change)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cooking, is chemical reaction)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be called chemical change)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cooking, is chemical reaction)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical change)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(cooking, be called chemical change)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cooking, be considered chemical change)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cooking, be called chemical change)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cooking, is chemical reactions)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cooking, is chemical reactions)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cooking, be considered chemical change)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cooking, is chemical change)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be chemical change)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cooking, be called chemical change)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cooking, be chemical change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cooking, is chemical change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cooking, be chemical change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(cooking, is chemical change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cooking, is chemical reaction)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(cooking, is chemical change)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(cooking, be chemical change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cooking, is chemical reactions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(baking, is chemical reaction)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(frying, is chemical reaction)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(baking, is chemical change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(frying, is chemical change)