cooking: be with oil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.65
, craft
Weight: 0.62
, art
Weight: 0.61
, method
Weight: 0.60
, matter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings frying
Weight: 0.44
, baking
Weight: 0.36
, woodworking
Weight: 0.35
, gardening
Weight: 0.34
, quilting
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with oil 1.00
be with gas 0.88
be with coconut oil 0.85
has state gas 0.83
be with olive oil 0.83
be olive bad oil 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(frying, be olive bad oil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(frying, be olive bad oil)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(frying, be olive bad oil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cooking, be with oil)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cooking, be with gas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cooking, has state gas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cooking, has state gas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cooking, has state gas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be olive bad oil)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(cooking, be with gas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cooking, be olive bad oil)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cooking, be olive bad oil)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cooking, be with gas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be with coconut oil)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be with gas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(cooking, be with coconut oil)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cooking, be with coconut oil)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cooking, has state gas)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cooking, be olive bad oil)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be with olive oil)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cooking, be with coconut oil)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(cooking, be with olive oil)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(cooking, be with olive oil)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cooking, be with olive oil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be with oil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cooking, be with oil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be with oil)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(frying, be olive bad oil)