cooking: improve raw meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.65
, craft
Weight: 0.62
, art
Weight: 0.61
, method
Weight: 0.60
, matter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings frying
Weight: 0.44
, baking
Weight: 0.36
, woodworking
Weight: 0.35
, gardening
Weight: 0.34
, quilting
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve raw meat 1.00
improve meat 0.94
make meat tender 0.80
make food taste better 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(cooking, improve raw meat)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cooking, improve meat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(cooking, improve meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cooking, improve meat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cooking, make food taste better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking, improve meat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cooking, make food taste better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(cooking, make meat tender)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cooking, make meat tender)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cooking, make meat tender)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cooking, make meat tender)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(cooking, make food taste better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cooking, make food taste better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cooking, improve raw meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cooking, improve raw meat)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cooking, improve raw meat)