cooking: make food taste better

Related concepts

Parents	hobby Weight: 0.65 , craft Weight: 0.62 , art Weight: 0.61 , method Weight: 0.60 , matter Weight: 0.59
Siblings	frying Weight: 0.44 , baking Weight: 0.36 , woodworking Weight: 0.35 , gardening Weight: 0.34 , quilting Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
make food taste better	1.00
improve raw meat	0.77
improve meat	0.76
be considered healthy cooking	0.76
has quality good	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(hobby, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(cooking, make food taste better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(hobby, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(hobby, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(quilting, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(baking, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(gardening, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(hobby, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(cooking, make food taste better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(gardening, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(gardening, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(quilting, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(quilting, has quality good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(baking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(baking, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(cooking, make food taste better)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(cooking, improve raw meat)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(cooking, improve meat)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(cooking, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(cooking, improve meat)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(cooking, improve meat)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(cooking, improve raw meat)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(cooking, improve meat)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(cooking, improve raw meat)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(cooking, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(cooking, improve raw meat)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(cooking, has quality good)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(cooking, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cooking, make food taste better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(cooking, make food taste better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(hobby, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(gardening, has quality good)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(quilting, has quality good)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(baking, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(cooking, make food taste better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(hobby, has quality good)